The Madness Behind the Curtain
Imagine trying to run a global economy with a Rube Goldberg machine — a tangled mess of pulleys, spinning wheels, marbles cascading through labyrinths, and levers triggered by candles burning through strings.
Every part depends on the somewhat uncertain success of the next. Every mistake, delay, or mismatch sends the entire contraption into frantic recovery mode.
Yet this is, in essence, the world we live in today.
The modern financial system — the infrastructure that moves trillions of dollars, euros, yen, and yuan every day — is not built on direct, verifiable actions. It is built on messages: instructions, promises, confirmations, and reconciliations flying back and forth among thousands of institutions, hoping to stay synchronized. When you initiate a simple payment, your bank doesn’t move the money instantly, unless the payee has their account in the same bank. Instead, it sends a message to another bank, or through a clearing system, asking for the money to be moved.
Each institution trusts that the others will interpret the messages correctly, act faithfully, and eventually settle the obligations. Settlement itself — the real act of transferring value — can take days, passing through layers of intermediaries who exist solely to compensate for the fact that no single message can be fully trusted on its own.
Mortgages, securities trades, syndicated loans, insurance contracts — they all work the same way. Not as singular, self-contained transactions, but as sprawling, stitched-together trails of paperwork, messaging, and trust-in-process.
Trust, in today’s system, is not embedded in the transaction. It is manufactured through bureaucracy, after-the-fact verification, and endless reconciliation.
It’s a miracle that the machine works at all.
And when it breaks — as it did in 2008, as it nearly did during the COVID liquidity crisis — the consequences ripple globally in minutes. Behind the sleek apps and polished financial products, there is madness behind the curtain.
And yet, quietly, a new reality is beginning to emerge. A future where transactions are not inferred by networks of messages, but proven the moment they occur. Where trust is not manufactured by institutions after the fact, but built directly into the act of transacting.
A future where finance, and by extension the economy it serves, finally operates with the precision, elegance, and reliability of a Swiss watch.
This transformation — from messaging to verifiable transactions, from chaos to precision — is already underway. It will not merely optimize finance; it will redefine it. And its effects will reach far beyond banking, reshaping the very architecture of economic activity.
The Rube Goldberg machine’s days are numbered.
The age of the Swiss watch is coming.
How Finance Became a Rube Goldberg Machine
At first, the complexity made sense. In the early days of banking and commerce, trust was local. Merchants and bankers knew each other personally, and transactions were settled by handshakes and ledger entries, often recorded in ink on thick paper ledgers.
As economies grew and interactions stretched across cities, nations, and continents, the simple handshake was no longer enough. To bridge distance and scale, the financial world invented messages. A letter of credit sent by ship. A telex authorizing payment. A SWIFT message instructing the transfer of funds between banks.
Each message carried an instruction, but not the act itself.
At every step, human beings or institutions needed to interpret the message, decide if it was authentic, and act accordingly. At small scale, with trusted parties, this worked well enough. But as the system grew — faster, bigger, more interconnected — cracks began to show.
The Great Paper Chase
By the mid-20th century, finance was already buckling under its own weight.
The famous “paperwork crisis” on Wall Street in the late 1960s is a perfect example: So many stock trades were being conducted that brokerage houses literally couldn’t process the paperwork fast enough. Trades settled late. Some were lost. Errors piled up. Trust frayed. The New York Stock Exchange even considered closing two days a week just to let clerks catch up.
The solution wasn’t to reinvent the system. It was to automate the messages — not the transactions themselves. Electronic messaging systems like SWIFT were introduced, creating faster ways to send instructions across institutions. Clearinghouses were built to sit in the middle, absorbing and reconciling the possibly conflicting messages. Custodians were tasked with holding assets in trust, because no single party could rely on another’s records alone.
Each new layer solved one immediate problem but added new complexity, new latency, and new failure points. Over time, an entire galaxy of intermediaries emerged — not to create new value, but to compensate for the inability of financial institutions to trust transactions directly.
Finance became less about executing real economic actions and more about orchestrating an endless dance of messages, verifications, reconciliations, and risk mitigation.
The Inherent Fragility
The messaging-based model brought speed, yes — but also fragility, because:
Every message needs interpretation: Institutions must agree on standards, formats, and protocols, but deviations and misunderstandings are inevitable.
Every message can be spoofed or corrupted: Fraud, errors, or systemic vulnerabilities lurk in every gap.
Every message assumes good faith: Failures are caught later, not prevented at the point of action.
Settlement lags: The actual movement of assets or money often trails the intent to act by hours or days, opening windows for market disruption.
Trust in this model isn’t natural. It’s manufactured — assembled after the fact, by costly and cumbersome layers of validation, auditing, dispute resolution, and insurance. And the larger the system grew, the more paradoxical it became: The faster financial messages could move, the more the system needed to slow down to verify what had actually happened.
Today’s global finance system can move billions of dollars across the world in seconds — but can take days, or even weeks, to truly settle and confirm ownership system-wide.
Why It Has Persisted
Given its flaws, why has the messaging model persisted for so long?
Because, until now, there was no other option.
Building verifiable, decentralized transaction systems was technologically impossible in the pre-digital world.
Institutions vested in the current structure are powerful and profitable.
Regulation itself has grown around the messaging model, reinforcing its assumptions and processes.
It’s not a conspiracy. It’s simply technological and institutional inertia — a world built on tools that were once cutting-edge, but now resemble archaic machinery barely kept running by layer upon layer of maintenance.
Today, we have reached the limits of this approach.
The Rube Goldberg machine cannot be scaled indefinitely. The complexity itself becomes the systemic risk. The friction consumes more and more value. The fragility cannot be patched forever.
Fortunately, we no longer have to patch it. For the first time, a fundamentally different architecture is not only possible — it is emerging.
In the next chapter, we will step into that future: a world where transactions are verifiable, trust is embedded, and finance ticks with the effortless precision of a Swiss watch.
Building a Swiss Watch for Economic Trust
Where the old system relied on a cascade of messaging, human interpretation, and reconciliation, the new world being born operates differently at its core.
In the coming financial system, the transaction itself becomes the source of truth.
No longer will financial institutions infer reality from a blur of messages. They will see, verify, and act upon cryptographically proven transactions — each complete, unambiguous, and independently verifiable by any party involved.
This change is not merely technical. It represents a fundamental reordering of how economic trust is created, measured, and exchanged. And like a Swiss watch, the new system will achieve its power not through brute force, but through precision, elegance, and perfect internal coordination.
The New Fabric: Decentralized, Verifiable Transactions
At the heart of this transformation lies a simple but profound idea:
Trust should not be inferred. It should be proven.
Through technologies like Self-Sovereign Identity (SSI), Verifiable Credentials (VCs), Decentralized Identifiers (DIDs), and cryptographic signatures, economic actors — human and machine — can now create transactions that are:
Authentic — verifiably issued by who they claim to be.
Integral — the data has not been tampered with or altered.
Non-repudiable — the sender cannot later deny the action.
Instantly verifiable — by anyone permitted to see it.
The Internet Trust Layer (ITL) makes this possible by creating a universal, decentralized transaction-based trust fabric.
Person Agents and Contract Agents interact across this layer, representing individuals, companies, institutions — negotiating, contracting, and executing with built-in verifiability.
Every economic interaction — whether a payment, a loan, a securities trade, an insurance policy, or a supply chain order — becomes a self-contained, cryptographically signed contract.
Each contract is:
Machine-readable for automation,
Human-understandable for oversight,
Cryptographically immutable for trust.
This is not “trust after the fact,” as in the current model. This is trust at the moment of action.
Agentic Banks: Living Engines of Economic Precision
Banks do not vanish in this world. They evolve into agentic banks — dynamic ecosystems of intelligent agents operating under their regulatory charters.
Each bank operates:
Person Agents — representing customers (individuals, companies) for payments, lending, custody, and advice.
Contract Agents — offering specific financial services: mortgages, trade finance, insurance underwriting, securities issuance, and more.
Agents are soft-minded — capable of understanding complex contextual nuance — and hard-shelled — unbreakable in their enforcement of cryptographic integrity and contract terms.
In this model:
A mortgage isn’t a months-long process — it’s a dynamic contract executed in minutes.
A payment isn’t a promise — it’s an immediate, verifiable act.
Securities aren’t reconciled in back offices — they are assigned, proven, and recognized at the moment of trade.
Liquidity moves at the speed of trust. Risk management becomes more localized and precise — because every obligation is tied to a verifiable transaction history, not a speculative balance of messages.
Regulatory compliance shifts from static reporting to real-time, embedded verification: Auditors and regulators observe proofs, not paper trails.
Precision Without Centralization
Importantly, this new system achieves precision without reintroducing central intermediaries. Unlike centralized clearinghouses or custodians, the trust fabric is decentralized:
Every participant maintains their own verifiable transaction history (their “micro-ledger”).
Contracts are discoverable, but not universally visible — preserving privacy.
Trust is transitive through verifiable proofs, not a handful of trusted third parties.
The architecture resembles a Swiss watch:
Each cog (agent) has a clear role and known interface.
Each motion (transaction) is precise and synchronized.
The entire system ticks smoothly because every element knows exactly what to do and when — without needing a centralized conductor to scream orders.
This isn’t chaos. It’s emergent order, arising naturally from verifiable actions.
Why This Model Matters
This transition is not a luxury. It is a necessity.
Speed: Economic activity will flow at the true speed of digital interaction, not be throttled by human reconciliation cycles.
Resilience: Localized risk means fewer systemic collapses when individual actors fail.
Inclusion: New entrants — individuals, startups, emerging market players — can participate in global finance without relying on gatekeepers.
Innovation: Business models previously impossible (real-time supply chain finance, dynamic multi-party trade contracts, programmable money) become feasible.
Transparency: Trust is rebuilt not by reputation, but by verifiable behavior.
In this future, trust and action are the same thing. The Rube Goldberg machine strained to simulate trust through endless messaging and human effort. The Swiss watch builds trust directly into every tick, every motion, every transaction.
This is the architecture upon which the next era of the global economy will rise.
In the next chapter, we will explore just how profound — and underestimated — this transformation truly is.
More Than Finance: A Shift in Civilization Itself
At first glance, this transformation — moving from messaging-based finance to verifiable transaction-based finance — might seem like a technical upgrade, a modernization of infrastructure.
It is not. It is something far larger: a foundational shift in how human civilization coordinates action, allocates resources, and organizes trust.
The Hidden Role of Finance in Civilization
Finance is not merely an industry. It is the coordination system of the economy — the invisible network that matches savers with borrowers, buyers with sellers, risk-takers with risk-hedgers, innovators with investors.
Without finance, factories do not get built. Ships do not sail. New medicines do not reach the market. Wages do not flow. Homes do not change hands. Finance is how we decide what gets built, what gets destroyed, and what gets preserved.
Today’s financial system, despite its inefficiencies, enables civilization to function at scale. It is the beating heart behind global trade, technological advancement, and social mobility. Thus, when the underlying structure of finance changes, it doesn’t just affect banks and brokers. It alters the DNA of civilization itself.
Historic Parallels: When Coordination Systems Changed Everything
Throughout history, similar transformations in coordination systems have redefined what human societies could achieve:
The invention of writing (Sumer, 4th millennium BC):
Transformed oral agreements into permanent records, enabling cities, taxes, and organized governance.
The creation of standardized money (Lydia, 7th century BC):
Replaced barter and personal credit with universally accepted, state-backed tokens of value, allowing anonymous large-scale trade.
The development of double-entry bookkeeping (Italy, 14th century):
Enabled corporations and multinational trade by making it possible to model risk and profit accurately across distance and time.
The emergence of the internet (late 20th century):
Collapsed the cost of information transmission, birthing entirely new industries and changing the rhythm of social and economic life.
Each of these revolutions seemed technical at first. Each unleashed social, economic, and political forces that no one could fully predict.
We are now on the cusp of a similar leap.
The move from messaging-based finance to verifiable transaction-based finance will rewire the basic flows of economic trust and coordination — just as writing, money, bookkeeping, and the internet did before.
What Changes When Trust Becomes Native
When verifiable trust is embedded in transactions themselves, the effects ripple outward:
Economic Velocity Increases:
Trust friction disappears. Deals close faster. Liquidity circulates more freely. Innovation accelerates.
Financial Inclusion Deepens:
Access to capital and services no longer requires proximity to power or reputation in old networks. A verifiable identity and trustworthy behavior are enough.
Systemic Risk Decreases:
Fragile interdependencies and slow-moving crises are replaced by localized, transparent exposures. Failure is contained, not contagious.
Business Models Evolve:
Entire industries based on verification and reconciliation (escrow services, custodians, auditors) shrink or transform. New models based on dynamic, programmable contracts flourish.
Governance Becomes Embedded:
Compliance, regulation, and oversight become part of transaction execution itself — not reactive afterthoughts, but real-time realities.
This is not merely a more efficient financial system. It is a more responsive, transparent, and adaptive economy. An economy where micro-transactions and macro-structures co-evolve naturally, without the drag of mistrust and bureaucratic delay.
The Civilizational Stakes
As in every previous era of coordination-system transformation, this shift will have winners and losers.
Those who embrace decentralized, verifiable action will thrive.
Those who cling to centralized control, opacity, and trust-by-reputation will struggle to survive.
Societies that update their economic infrastructures will unlock new layers of growth, innovation, and social dynamism. Those that resist will watch their relevance erode, slowly at first, then suddenly. The stakes are enormous — not just for banks and investors, but for nations, communities, and individuals.
The Rube Goldberg machine served its purpose for a time. It allowed civilizations to grow far beyond what simple oral agreements and trust-in-person could support. But it has reached its natural end. The future demands something better — something more precise, more resilient, and more humane. And we now have the tools, the knowledge, and the necessity to build it.
In the next chapter, we will explore the challenges ahead — and why making this leap will require not just better technology, but a complete shift in mindset.
Shutting Down the Old Machine
Recognizing that the Rube Goldberg machine must be replaced is the first step. Actually shutting it gradually down — and replacing it with a Swiss watch of verifiable transactions — is far harder. The obstacles are not merely technical. They are deeply psychological, institutional, and regulatory.
For centuries, institutions have been built, careers have been made, and fortunes have been secured by operating within the machinery of message-based finance. The habits, incentives, and assumptions embedded in this world do not yield easily to change — even when the superiority of the new model is obvious.
If the transformation is to succeed, it must overcome several major barriers.
1. Institutional Inertia: The Comfort of the Known
Organizations, like people, cling to what they know. Most financial institutions today are optimized for surviving in the old system, not pioneering a new one:
Layers of departments — payments, settlements, reconciliations, compliance — are built around messaging.
Profits are embedded in managing inefficiencies: custody fees, float income, complex clearing arrangements.
Organizational cultures are shaped by decades of regulatory and operational practices designed to patch the flaws of message-based finance.
Even when leaders recognize the future intellectually, the comfort of the known, the fear of the unknown, and the cost of change hold them back. It is easier to optimize the Rube Goldberg machine one more time than to admit it must be dismantled.
2. Mindset Traps: Mistaking Messaging Improvements for Transformation
There is a temptation to believe that better messaging — faster payments, better APIs, smarter reconciliation software — is enough.
It is not.
You cannot turn a Rube Goldberg machine into a Swiss watch by adding more efficient marbles or faster pulleys. The underlying architecture must change from messaging about actions to cryptographically proven actions themselves. Improving the old model may buy time, but it ultimately deepens dependency on a system that cannot scale into the future.
True transformation requires rethinking from first principles:
What if trust were native?
What if verification were instant?
What if financial services were contracts, not promises?
Without a radical mindset shift, institutions risk becoming more efficient dinosaurs — faster, but still doomed.
3. Regulatory Lag: Rules Built for the Old World
Regulation, too, is built around the messaging model:
Reporting obligations assume post-transaction verification.
Compliance procedures are designed for manual audits.
Risk models depend on delayed, aggregated data.
In a world of verifiable transactions, much of this becomes obsolete or needs to be reimagined. But regulators, bound by legal mandates and political caution, move slowly. Their incentives favor incremental change and protection of the status quo. There is a real danger that regulatory frameworks could hinder innovation — not because of malice, but because of misalignment with new realities.
Thus, forward-thinking regulators will need to:
Understand and embrace verifiable transaction architectures.
Shift from regulating processes to verifying outcomes.
Focus on system integrity rather than participant identity alone.
The rulebook must evolve alongside the tools.
4. Fear of Decentralization: Losing Control to Gain Trust
Decentralization triggers deep institutional anxieties. In traditional finance, control — over settlement, custody, access — equals power. Decentralized systems challenge this power by making trust ambient rather than controlled.
Leaders must accept that:
Trustworthiness will no longer be guaranteed by brand or history, but by cryptographic proofs.
Economic coordination will shift from hierarchical control to peer-to-peer verifiability.
Power will derive from providing value-added services, not from bottlenecking access.
This is a profound psychological shift. But those who embrace it will find new forms of strength — and new opportunities for leadership.
5. Human Factors: Courage, Imagination, and Will
Ultimately, the greatest barrier is human. Building a Swiss watch from the ruins of a Rube Goldberg machine requires:
Courage to admit that the old system, no matter how comfortable, is inadequate for the future.
Imagination to envision what a truly verifiable economy looks like — and how much better it could be.
Will to drive change against inertia, skepticism, and vested interests.
This transformation will not happen automatically. It must be led — by institutions, regulators, technologists, and visionaries who are willing to think bigger than optimization and faster than fear.
History shows that when coordination systems change, those who move first and boldly reshape the future. The same will be true now.
The Future Ticks in Our Hands
The Rube Goldberg machine will not collapse all at once. Its marbles will keep rolling, its pulleys spinning, its clumsy dance persisting — for a time. But the cracks are already there for all to see:
Fragile settlement systems that freeze under stress.
Endless reconciliation cycles that bleed billions in costs and delay.
Systemic risks that no amount of messaging can fully contain.
Meanwhile, the tools to build something better are no longer hypothetical. They are real. They are tested. They are ready. The architecture of decentralized, verifiable transactions stands before us — not as a dream, but as a working reality.
Through systems like the Internet Trust Layer, we can construct a financial system — and by extension, an economy — that operates with:
Immediate trust,
Transparent obligations,
Embedded resilience,
Unprecedented speed.
An economy where actions are verifiable at the moment they occur. Where financial institutions are no longer fortresses guarding opacity, but ecosystems of precision, adaptability, and trust. An economy that ticks — cleanly, predictably, harmoniously — like a Swiss watch.
The Moment of Decision
Every great civilizational shift brings a moment when the old world and the new exist side by side. One path offers the comfort of familiarity, but at the cost of growing fragility. The other demands courage, imagination, and effort — but offers a future of strength and dynamism.
Today, we stand at such a fork.
Institutions, regulators, and innovators must choose:
Patch the Rube Goldberg machine one more time, knowing it is ultimately unsustainable,
Or build the Swiss watch — a financial and economic system that serves humanity’s needs with elegance, resilience, and integrity.
The future will not wait forever. Others are already moving. Every delay cedes advantage to those bold enough to lead.
Our Hands on the Clock
The clock is ticking. We can cling to an increasingly precarious machine, adding ever more elaborate fixes to its worn gears and fraying strings. Or we can set our hands to a different task:
— crafting the new gears,
— forging the new springs,
— assembling a financial system that measures not just money, but the trust and progress of civilization itself.
This is not just a technological opportunity. It is a moral and economic imperative. The Rube Goldberg machine had its moment. Now, the world deserves — and demands — a Swiss watch.
And the future ticks in our hands.
Share this post